The poor and Violation of Constitutional Due Process…


We wrote the following letter to the judge of the U.S. Dist. Ct. of Appeals for the Eastern Dist. of Ca. Listed below is our simple explanation of the letter in brief:

We did this to ask for protection against the harms from the government & their associates; so, we may have time to complete and file our criminal complaint that was in construction.

The court clerk [re]worded a few times that this document [is] our complaint- which is a “complete” lie.

The federal court is in the process and attempting to violate our constitutional Due Process so we shall not be able to argue and convict their government criminals who are hurting so many Americans. This was done because we are ‘poor’ and do not possess the money to pay for the filing fees and still live; hoarding our In Forma Pauperis to waive court cost while our time limit runs out in the next higher court where our appeal is currently at.

To: U.S. Dist. Ct. for the E. Dist. Of Ca., Sac., Ca., 95814.

Fr: Tait & Lisa Belyew

Re: Federal Case No.  2:15 CV-00453 MCE-EFB. IN FORMA PAUPERIS.

Dear Judge of the court,

1(a).  The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the clerks of these courts have been playing phone tag with us about an issue. We have come to this conclusion.

(b). In your Dist. Ct., we filed for ‘Injunctive Relief from harm’ and ‘In Forma Pauperis.

©. Judge ENGLAND denied our ‘Injunctive Relief from harm’ while we prepare our Criminal Complaint.

(d). Judge BRENNAN was to hear our ‘In Forma Pauperis’ which he never did.

2(a).  We sent the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California [NOTICE] we are appealing Judge ENGLAND’s denial.

(b).  We appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and they denied our ‘In Forma Pauperis’ claiming that the ‘In Forma Pauperis’ we filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California was still pending [Judge BRENNAN]. That this judge must send the order they have granted our ‘Informa Pauperis’ before they can process our appeal or we must set up a payment plan with the United States District Court for the Eastern District.

©.  We again called and informed the United States District Court for the Eastern District we have a right to appeal their ruling and we have court time frames to go by and Judge BRENNAN cannot hold our ‘In Forma Pauperis’ and not rule on it, thus, blocking us from appeal. We were directed by Court Clerk NICK to send a writing to the judge of this court informing him of this fact if we feel like our Rights had been violated.

3(a).  We, Tait & Lisa Belyew, are currently on Social Security/SSI and receive in the $900.oo range a month to live on each. $500.oo filing fee we cannot afford and cannot live off the remaining money.

(b).  We request a ruling on our ‘In Forma Pauperis’ so we can appeal the denial of Judge ENGLAND’s order, or that the court allow us to make monthly payments and allow our court Due Process to still be in compliance with our United States Constitution.

©.  We must not be blocked from the Federal Court process because we are poverty level citizens, poor, and are seeking to file a criminal complaint on top government officials, who are co-defendants in crime, such as, but not limited to:

President OBAMA et al, California Governor BROWN et al, Tsi-Akim MAIDU Corporation et al.

4(a).  United States District Court Judge BRENNAN cannot confiscate our ‘In Forma Pauperis’ and not rule on it or allow us to make payment, as prisoners get to make payments and still have their time limit Due Process Rights under our United States constitution in standing, and have our appeal time limits expire in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

(b). This fact is especially against our constitution when Life, and Limb, and Freedom [violation of U.S.Const. XIII Amed. SLAVERY], is in jeopardy as it is.

©.  And, Judge ENGLAND cannot lawfully deny our ‘Injunctive Relief from harm’ while we prepare or criminal complaint; in regard to the amount of evidence we sent. But this judge did anyway, so we have the Right to appeal.

We Declare Under Penalty of Perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 6/24/2015.

Tait & Lisa Belyew.

Advertisements

leave a reply and I will get back to you at the beep!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: